So we all remember when Matty Harrold had to play in goal after Jensen was injured. There was a close shave when we played Torquay that Bulman would have had to go in goal. This bodes the question - If we don't sign anyone as a GK before tomorrow, who would you put in goal if Addai gets injured?
So we all remember when Matty Harrold had to play in goal after Jensen was injured. There was a close shave when we played Torquay that Bulman would have had to go in goal. This bodes the question - If we don't sign anyone as a GK before tomorrow, who would you put in goal if Addai gets injured?
So we all remember when Matty Harrold had to play in goal after Jensen was injured. There was a close shave when we played Torquay that Bulman would have had to go in goal. This bodes the question - If we don't sign anyone as a GK before tomorrow, who would you put in goal if Addai gets injured?
I'd go in goal myself if I thought it would do any good. I can't be any worse than that Watford loanee we had - at least I might get in the way of a few shots.
According to EFL Rule 44.8.1 a goalkeeper would have had to been registered by 12pm today to play at Sutton, so it looks like we only have Addai tomorrow unless the club are keeping it secret. The emergency goalkeeper rule 58 rules not cover owner incompetence just injury,suspension of international call up.
Well, it’s okay because previous managers have thought it perfectly acceptable to go into games with only one goalkeeper signed on. What could possibly go wrong?
Well, it’s okay because previous managers have thought it perfectly acceptable to go into games with only one goalkeeper signed on. What could possibly go wrong?
The last time it happened the 2 points it may have cost us Sent us down.
Given the position we are in the league and going into the Sutton game, if we have no keeper on the books registered and on the bench then we have hit a new low. Totally unacceptable WAGMI to risk playing a vital league match with no sub keeper.
Still no sign of a second keeper for tomorrow night. I see Hartlepool have bought in a third keeper in from Leicester, why do we still only have one! Maybe they will be asking for a volunteer to sit on the bench, in the Reds Bar prior to the game?
There must be lots of keepers available, I find it hard to believe otherwise as there is only the one position in a football match for a keeper. Surely, even if we get a keeper that has no experience in the professional game, just semi-professional its better than taking the risk of no reserve keeper. OK, I do no think the game will go ahead but the club have to plan for it ging ahead and Saturday isn't that far off anyway.