But, the league table they included is too large, as they missed the bottom four in the table off. Surely someone should be proof-reading this, or are they trying to be deliberately disrespectful to the bottom four.
If they stay the same size, with only the top twenty showing, we won't even appear on Tuesday.
Seriously, does anyone proof read the programmes. Tuesday night's one was another example of stupid, lazy mistakes.
The General Manager's Notes, included the sentence, "falling to defeat away to Rochdale". If the General Manager doesn't know we drew away to Rochdale, what hope is there?
The fixtures and results pages are a shambles (I'm lucky that I can read quite small print). On the legend at the bottom, two boxes are labelled as Used Sub and Unused Sub each. Looking at the details, one of them should be yellow card, and one red card. The minute of the goals scored should be against each player in the detail. But according to the detail, no one scored in the 2-0 win over Fulham, no one scored in the 1-1 draw at Rochdale, and only Tom Nichols scored in the 2-2 draw at Salford.
Apart from one programme there have been glaring errors in all of them. Incorrect titles to pages or features. Postscript notes left the same as the issue before. Incorrect scores. A school magazine would be ashamed to be issued in this state.
Seriously, does anyone proof read the programmes. Tuesday night's one was another example of stupid, lazy mistakes.
The General Manager's Notes, included the sentence, "falling to defeat away to Rochdale". If the General Manager doesn't know we drew away to Rochdale, what hope is there?
The fixtures and results pages are a shambles (I'm lucky that I can read quite small print). On the legend at the bottom, two boxes are labelled as Used Sub and Unused Sub each. Looking at the details, one of them should be yellow card, and one red card. The minute of the goals scored should be against each player in the detail. But according to the detail, no one scored in the 2-0 win over Fulham, no one scored in the 1-1 draw at Rochdale, and only Tom Nichols scored in the 2-2 draw at Salford.
Apart from one programme there have been glaring errors in all of them. Incorrect titles to pages or features. Postscript notes left the same as the issue before. Incorrect scores. A school magazine would be ashamed to be issued in this state.
At the start of the season I contacted the office regarding the program and the fact that it was totally too small both in size and the fonts were inappropriate for purpose. Last season’s program was one of the best in league 2. People with impaired sight have not got a chance so come let’s get this changed. The office has still not responded.
At the start of the season I contacted the office regarding the program and the fact that it was totally too small both in size and the fonts were inappropriate for purpose. Last season’s program was one of the best in league 2. People with impaired sight have not got a chance so come let’s get this changed. The office has still not responded.
Well done ct - good work, keep it up as your feedback is important !
At the start of the season I contacted the office regarding the program and the fact that it was totally too small both in size and the fonts were inappropriate for purpose. Last season’s program was one of the best in league 2. People with impaired sight have not got a chance so come let’s get this changed. The office has still not responded.
Every few years this pops up. Then we give it to a someone else to edit and it gets better. Then he moves on and it drops of again.
I've had a few laughs over the years. I seem to recall one team played in prange and lack and a linesman who had a creasy flag (cerise). "Iron it man" were the shouts from the terraces.